<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Make The Web Faster (by Google)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web-kreation.com/all/lets-make-the-web-faster-by-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web-kreation.com/all/lets-make-the-web-faster-by-google/</link>
	<description>Web &#38; Graphic Design by Jeremie Tisseau, Web Design Consultant at Calleo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:52:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr-H</title>
		<link>http://web-kreation.com/all/lets-make-the-web-faster-by-google/#comment-20279</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr-H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-kreation.com/?p=1779#comment-20279</guid>
		<description>thanks for this tut.
I think download from external links (javascript and css) make pages faster to download. because it reduces the http requests, and cached by the browser.i&#039;ve installed a plugin called YSlow mozilla, just perfect to see the performance of my site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for this tut.<br />
I think download from external links (javascript and css) make pages faster to download. because it reduces the http requests, and cached by the browser.i&#8217;ve installed a plugin called YSlow mozilla, just perfect to see the performance of my site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremie Tisseau</title>
		<link>http://web-kreation.com/all/lets-make-the-web-faster-by-google/#comment-6161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremie Tisseau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-kreation.com/?p=1779#comment-6161</guid>
		<description>In google&#039;s case (only buttons), it is more interesting to have just one big image and change the background position for each button image than to have 30 or more images and load them one by one. It seems to take a little bit longer the first time you load the big image but once it is done it is ready to use for all the buttons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In google&#8217;s case (only buttons), it is more interesting to have just one big image and change the background position for each button image than to have 30 or more images and load them one by one. It seems to take a little bit longer the first time you load the big image but once it is done it is ready to use for all the buttons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George - Planet Anarky</title>
		<link>http://web-kreation.com/all/lets-make-the-web-faster-by-google/#comment-6160</link>
		<dc:creator>George - Planet Anarky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-kreation.com/?p=1779#comment-6160</guid>
		<description>Interesting article: I&#039;ve seen this technique once or twice before, and it&#039;s certainly a novel way of showing imagery.

I wonder, though, whether 1x big image takes up more space than lots of smaller optimised images? I dunno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article: I&#8217;ve seen this technique once or twice before, and it&#8217;s certainly a novel way of showing imagery.</p>
<p>I wonder, though, whether 1x big image takes up more space than lots of smaller optimised images? I dunno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

